We respectfully request the team to implement mechanisms that ensure real skin in the game.
We vote AYE with conviction because we believe the current market conditions call for pushing the ambassador program forward. At the same time, we think there are viable technical options to achieve this, for example: requiring a minimum stake of 100,000 ACA as mentioned in the forum, or having participants agree to receive payments with a vesting schedule equal to the program’s duration.This way, we offer flexibility to everyone while still demanding true skin in the game.
We will implement a 50,000 ACA staking minimum to be an Acala Ambassador
I completely agree.
It's necessary and should be one of the priorities.
The importance of technical and technological development, as well as cutting-edge innovation, must go hand in hand with strong marketing visibility and showing the world its potential.
It's not enough to be very good at something; you have to show it to the world. The world, especially today, works like that. It's an absolute priority to be seen and for the world to talk about Acala.
Well this proposal has the same flaws as the last one, it’s just marketing without a viable product. I‘d change my vote if there is any prerequisite like CryptoDev84 proposed in the forum, that every job requires a solid amount of staked ACA as skin in the game.