I want to explain my NAY vote here, rather than osn discord nor the forum as i dont want my Wallet connected to any socials.

I dont think, Acala should invest any further Grants in doubtful Marketing decissions as the relay chain does. Acala needs a viable product and should concentrate on this first!

The last proposals led to crappy designed dApps on the chain, some of them granting thousands of USD for rewarding their <50 Userbase! Our ambassadors and moderators dont know shit about Acala, as someone from pre-aUSD Incident times, this is embarassing.

I will continue vote Nay on any proposal, that i think is contraproductive for the treasury.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts — as a fellow investor in Acala, I really value your honesty and long-term perspective.

I understand your frustration, especially with the weight of your vote. It’s clear you care deeply about the protocol, and your message feels like a much-needed wake-up call.

Personally, I see the recent proposals as steps to improve and refocus, not as a repeat of past mistakes. We’re trying to reignite user activity and build on what I think is Acala’s biggest strength: its liquidity infrastructure.

I’d love to hear what you think has worked so far, and what kind of initiatives you'd support. If we align the vision, I believe we (the investors) can find a win-win path forward.

Let’s keep building — together.

https://forum.acala.network/t/proposal-for-acala-ambassador-program-v3/2754

#404·Proposal for Acala Ambassador Program V3